Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2011

M. Wolf über Krise im Euroraum

Martin Wolf fasst in der Financial Times das Grundproblem für die Krise im Euroraum gut zusammen:
"In brief, it is extremely difficult to eliminate fiscal deficits in the structural capital-importing countries, without prolonged recessions or huge improvements in their external competitiveness. But the latter is relative, so the needed improvements in the external performance of weak eurozone countries imply a deterioration in that of eurozone capital-exporters, or radically improved external performance for the eurozone as a whole. The former means that Germany becomes far less German. The latter implies that the eurozone becomes a mega-Germany. Who can believe either outcome is plausible?

This leaves much the most plausible outcome of the orgy of fiscal austerity: long-term structural recessions in vulnerable countries. To put it bluntly, the single currency will come to stand for wage falls, debt deflation and prolonged economic slumps. Can this stand, however big the costs of a break-up?

The eurozone has no credible plan to fix the flaws of the eurozone, apart from greater fiscal austerity: there is to be no fiscal, financial or political union; and there is to be no balanced mechanism for economic adjustment on both sides of the creditor-debtor divide. The decision is, instead, to try still harder with a stability and growth pact whose failures have been both predictable and persistent."

In meinen Augen ist das Fazit richtig. Die Krux liegt nicht im Stabilitäts- und Wachstumspakt, sondern in den Schwierigkeiten mit der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit einiger Länder.

Keine Kommentare:

Kommentar veröffentlichen